Jury & Trial Consultant

At The Simpson Tuegel Law Firm, we offer assistance in all aspects of jury and trial consulting to other practicing lawyers. You can benefit from our experience through our help with drafting the questions you will ask jurors in voir dire, preparing your witnesses for court testimony, and participating in a mock trial or focus group to thoroughly vet your trial strategies.

What you can expect from us

A collaborative approach to jury and trial consulting

There is simply no substitute for our trial experience, which informs every aspect of our advocacy. From our review of your civil case, we may recommend pretrial motions. In other cases, we may need to reserve developing a legal strategy until you have completed your search for evidence through civil discovery methods. If we are familiar with the court or jurisdiction, that may also influence how we approach settlement discussions. Thus, our step-by-step analysis is crucial not only to your trial preparations but also to how you respond to any last-minute settlement offers.

Respect for your attorney-client relationship

We understand that you are the primary point of contact with your client, and as previous attorney clients of ours can attest, we respect your attorney-client relationship. We will share our experience and expertise without imposing our style upon you or your relationship with your client.

Deep experience and game-changing insights

No one can predict the actions of a jury with 100 percent certainty, but there are certain insights that we have acquired from observing the decision-making of juries in hundreds of cases. When it comes to juries and trial preparation, experience truly is the best teacher.

To learn more about how we can help you build the best defense for your client, call our office at 214-774-9121 or fill out our contact form below.


Results

  • Life Partners Creditors’ Trust v. Brian Pardo, June 2017; jury awarded a $65 million verdict in favor of plaintiffs
  • Tina Lopez v. Polaris Industries, Inc., February 2018; jury awarded a $6 million dollar verdict in favor of the plaintiff